Recovery of Steelmaking Slag and Granite Waste in the Production of Rock Wool - PDF

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 8
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Information Report

Funny & Jokes


Views: 8 | Pages: 8

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

Related documents
Materials Research. 2015; 18(1): DOI: Recovery of Steelmaking Slag and Granite Waste in the Production of Rock Wool Joner Oliveira Alves a *, Denise
Materials Research. 2015; 18(1): DOI: Recovery of Steelmaking Slag and Granite Waste in the Production of Rock Wool Joner Oliveira Alves a *, Denise Crocce Romano Espinosa b, Jorge Alberto Soares Tenório b a SENAI Innovation Institute of Mineral Technologies, Federation of Industries of the State of Pará - FIEPA, Com. Brás de Aguiar Ave., 548, Nazaré, CEP , Belém, PA, Brazil b Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo USP, Prof. Mello Moraes Ave., 2463, CEP , São Paulo, SP, Brazil Received: September 8, 2014; Revised: January 12, 2015 Steelmaking slag and residues from granite cuttings are industrial wastes with considerable production, however limited applications. This work studied an inertization and recovery process of such wastes as raw materials into production of rock wool (i.e. a thermo-acoustic insulator with growing market). Several batches were produced aiming the chemical proprieties of a currently marketed rock wool. Mixtures were casted at temperatures of C, then quenched in water and also poured into a Herty Viscosimeter. Produced materials with thickness smaller than 500µm were characterized by chemical analyses, XRD, SEM, EDS and DTA. ThermoCalc software was used to simulate the cooling curves of rock wools. Results showed that incorporation of wastes does not affect the main qualities of rock wool, the thermal insulation and prevention of fire spread. Raw material batches of rock wools may assimilate up to 66% of granite waste, or 53% steelmaking slag, or 70% combining both materials. Keywords: steelmaking slag, granite waste, rock wool, thermal insulator 1. Introduction Recycling of solid wastes has been growing steadily in recent years, along with rising industrial production. The waste generation increase presents a serious problem of environment and costly disposal. Recovery of industrial wastes into useful subproducts might be economically viable, and it is desirable since the disposal involves expensive transportation, as well as the monitoring of deposit areas 1,2. Vitrification process has been widely used as final destination for hazardous materials due to the inertization capability of organic toxics, heavy metals, fly ashes and nuclear wastes 3-5. The world production of crude steel in 2010 reached about 1.4 billion tons, registering a new record of production. Considering that for each ton of steel produced are generated 150 kg of steelmaking slag, approximately 210 million tons of such waste were produced in ,7. The production of steel from electric arc furnaces has expanded due to the higher availability of steel scrap, which is the main component of the production charge 8. Steelmaking slag is the result of an aggregation of several elements which the presence is not important on steel making process. Among different wastes from the steel process, steelmaking slag represents one of most hazardous since it may contains heavy metals such as chromium, manganese and iron 9. About 20% of the world s production of steelmaking slag is not reused due the characteristics of this waste, mainly the expansibility problem. A large portion of industrial parks are occupied for this waste, which raises the disposal costs. Therefore, recycling and reusing slag is a technical, economic and environmental solution for steel companies 7,10. * Another industrial sector with high production of waste is the industry of granite cutting. Approximately 30% of powdered wastes are generated during the granite extraction process, specifically on the rock cutting. Such values represents that a single company may produce up to 35 tons of this residue per month. The granite waste need be appropriately managed, since the discharge in rivers, lakes or watersheds can cause siltation. Also, this residue may cause serious human health problems, such as silicosis. Currently, the granite waste is mainly used in civil construction to produce materials in the form of mortar, bricks and tiles 11,12. However, new applications for this waste are necessary due to the high produced volumes and the average growth of world production estimated at 6% per year 13,14. Rock wools are man-made mineral fibers (MMMF) fabricated with the melting of basalt or other natural rocks at temperatures above 1400 C 15,16. The thermo-acoustic characteristics of fire resistance, and not rendering toxic smoke ensure to rock wools a broad consumer market in the industries of construction, automotive, and electricelectronics, among others. Rock wools are usually produced with melting spinning process, in which a thin stream of material is dripped onto a wheel internally cooled with water or liquid nitrogen that causes a fast solidification 17,18. This study aims to recovery steelmaking slag and granite cutting waste as feedstock of rock wools by the replacement of traditional raw materials, reducing the costs and impact of disposal of such residues. In addition, the use of recycled materials decreases extraction of non-renewable resources necessary to produce the rock wool. 2015; 18(1) Recovery of Steelmaking Slag and Granite Waste in the Production of Rock Wool Experimental Methods 2.1. Materials The raw materials used in this study were steelmaking slag from an Electric Arc Furnace (EAF), granite cutting residue from an industry on Espírito Santo State - Brazil, and chemical reagents (i.e. silica, alumina, magnesium oxide, iron oxide, calcium carbonate, and borax). Steelmaking slag was received in blocks, thus the material was cracked into pieces smaller than 4.76 mm. Granite waste was received in a fine powder form, thus these were dried at 90 C for 24 hours before use Sample preparation Several mixtures were prepared using the residues and chemical additives. The batches were based on the chemical composition of a currently marketed rock wool provided by a thermo-acoustic company, and the range of composition recommended in the literature. Three cases were prepared: a) using only granite waste; b) using only steelmaking slag; and c) using both residues. The mixtures were homogenized during 10 minutes in a laboratory scale agitator. The main objective of the work was maximize the amount of residues in the batches, however some tests presented melting points above the furnace capacity or insufficient fluidity to allow pouring, thus these materials were discarded from the investigation. In this aspect, the characterization work was performed in the materials from batches with efficient and superior incorporation of the residues. The mixing compositions of such batches were: a) Using only granite waste - 66% granite waste and 34% chemical reagents (22.7% calcium carbonate, 6.6% magnesium oxide and 4.7% iron oxide); b) Using only steelmaking slag - 53% steelmaking slag and 47% chemical reagents (30.3% silica, 6.1% alumina, 6.1% magnesium oxide and 4.5% Borax); c) Using both residues: 46% granite waste, 23% steelmaking slag and 31% chemical reagents (21.9% calcium carbonate, 6.4% magnesium oxide and 2.7% iron oxide). The batches were heated in a laboratory-scale electric furnace with no controlled gas atmosphere during 50 min. The equipment operates open, the system pressure is constant, and a variation on oxygen pressure does not affect the equilibrium of phases. Melted samples were quenched in a water bath at room temperature in order to rapidly cool the materials, which is essential to produce vitreous materials. Three temperatures were used to cast the materials: 1400, 1450 and 1500 ºC, such range was based on the method of rock wool production cited in the literature 15,16. Temperatures of materials during the process were measured using an optical pyrometer. After the cooling process, samples of materials were collected and dried in an oven at 90 C for 24 hours Sample characterization Samples of produced materials in fiber forms and thickness smaller than 500µm were applied in the characterization processes. The nominal variation on the temperature not significantly affected the results of the produced materials, therefore only the characterization results of samples poured at 1450 C were selected to present in this work. Produced materials were characterized by chemical analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA). Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM) was used to verify formation of secondary phases in the produced materials, and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) was applied to establish the phase compositions. XRD analysis was carried out using a Philips MPD ma Diffractometer adjusted with copper Kα radiation (λ = Å) and voltage of 40 kv. The DTA was performed in a Netzsch 409C equipment with alumina crucibles, air atmosphere, and heating rate of 15 C/min. SEM/EDS analyses were conducted with a Philips XL-30 instrument using 3 kv voltage and working distance of 8.2 mm. The Herty Viscosity Test is frequently used in industry to provide quick and approximate values for comparative purposes. A Herty viscometer is composed of two steel blocks with a groove in the middle interface in which the melted material is poured. Thus, the distance travelled by the material before solidification is measured, and an approximation of viscosity value is obtained 19,20. A laboratory-scale Herty viscosimeter was applied in this work to measure variations on viscosity according to different batches compositions and casting temperatures. ThermoCalc software version n running SLAG3 databases was used to perform thermodynamic and phase diagram calculations for multi-component systems of practical importance. In this work, the numerical code was used to simulate the cooling curves of an industrial rock wool and of the produced materials in order to compare the primary solid phases. Chemical compositions of the materials, previously determined, were used for the ThermoCalc simulations. 3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Chemical analysis of wastes Results of the chemical analysis of steelmaking slag (see Table 1) shown that the main component of this residue is calcium oxide (46.9 wt. %). The recovery of steelmaking slag has restricted applications due to the volume instability, in which the main cause is the phenomenon of hydration of free lime, although hydration of free magnesia may Table 1. Chemical composition of residues used in the work (in wt. %). Elements Steelmaking slag Granite waste SiO CaO MgO Al Fe MnO Cr Na 2 O B Other 206 Alves et al. Materials Research also contribute 7,21. The volume instability can be solved by submitting the steelmaking slag to a vitrification process 22. Table 1 also provides the chemical analysis of the waste from granite cuttings. The main components of this residue are silica and alumina, together such oxides are responsible for almost 86% of the chemical composition. Therefore, granite waste was used as a source of these components in the production of vitreous materials Physical characteristics of formed materials Produced materials showed proprieties similar to glass: translucent, fragile and brittle at room temperature. The materials displayed a green color, which is reasonably due to the content of Fe 2 ( % by wt.). Different sizes and formats of materials were produced: pieces about 10 mm, fibres with thickness about 500 µm, and thin powder Chemical analysis of formed materials Table 2 provides the results of the chemical analyses of the rock wools produced in this study, sorted by each residue. This table also shows the chemical analyses of an industrial rock wool and the chemical composition range of rock wools cited in the literature 16, Produced materials showed high silica content ( % by wt.), which is the most common glass forming oxide. Responsible for about 30% of the chemical composition of produced materials, CaO, MgO, Na 2 O, K 2 O are usual glass modifiers that have the function of increase the fluidity and reduce the melting temperature. Alumina, Fe 2, MnO 2 and TiO 2 are intermediary components that provide specific characteristics in rock wools, such as thermal resistance and chemical stability 16,26. A comparison of the values described in Table 2 shown that materials produced using only steelmaking slag or with both wastes are composed of similar major elements that industrial rock wool, and also in accordance with the chemical composition range of rock wools mentioned in the literature. Material produced only with the granite waste contains the major elements according to the reference values, with the exception of a small discrepancy in alumina content (14.2 wt. %), which is difficult to control due to the high value found in the granite waste composition (19.3 wt. %) Cooling curves of materials The cooling curve is an important factor on studies of vitreous materials since the cooling condition directly affects the structure of formed material. Simulation results using ThermoCalc software are shown in Figure 1, in which the curves express number of moles of a phase present in the system (NP) by the temperature. Cooling curve based on the chemical composition of industrial rock wool is shown in Figure 1d. The first solid phase displayed is the spinel (MgAl 2 O 4 ) formed approximately at 1220 C, and the second solid phase is the calcium silicate CaO SiO 2 formed around at 1210 C. Simulations using chemical compositions of the formed materials are shown in Figures 1a, 1b and 1c. The produced rock wools showed behaviour similar to the industrial rock wool, in which all samples presented spinel as the first phase and calcium silicate as the second phase. Spinel phases were formed at C, and calcium silicate phases were formed at C. Phase s diagrams of rock wools also showed the formation of the phases CaO-MgO-SiO 2, Fe 2, MgO-SiO 2 and SiO 2 -Al 2 on a temperature range of C. Such phases were not highlighted in Figure 1 in order to emphasise the temperatures of primary phases, which are directly related with the formation of vitreous materials. ThermoCalc simulations also indicated that raw materials based on wastes (Figures 1a, 1b and 1c) and the traditional raw materials (Figure 1d) have approximate melting points, around 1200 C. Therefore, the use of steelmaking slag and granite waste as raw material should not affect the energy efficiency of the rock wool industrial process X-ray diffraction analysis of materials The X-ray diffraction spectra of the produced materials are shown in Figure 2. Rock wool is an amorphous material, therefore it should present a homogeneous curve without notable crystalline peaks. The X-ray diffraction spectra of a current marketed rock wool is shown in Figure 2d, which Table 2. Comparison of chemical compositions of rock wool samples: Industrial wool, literature range and produced materials sorted by each applied residue (in wt. %). Elements Reference Values Produced Materials Industrial sample Literature range * Granite waste Steel. slag Both residues SiO CaO Al MgO Fe Na 2 O K 2 O MnO TiO Others * Values cited in the literature by several authors: Buck 23 ; Liddell & Miller 24 ; Luoto et al. 25 ; TIMA 16. 2015; 18(1) Recovery of Steelmaking Slag and Granite Waste in the Production of Rock Wool 207 Figure 1. Cooling curves of rock wools fabricated using only granite waste (a), only steelmaking slag (b), both residues (c), and from a industrial sample (d). Figure 2. X-ray diffraction spectra of rock wools fabricated using only granite waste (a), only steelmaking slag (b), both residues (c), and from a industrial sample (d). 208 Alves et al. confirms the homogeneous curve and serves as reference to compare with the produced materials. The material obtained using only granite waste presented a spectrum with some crystalline peaks (see Figure 2a). Such peaks are characteristic of spinel, the first solid phase formed during the cooling, which is in accordance with the thermodynamic computational simulation of rock wools (Figure 1). The spinel formation indicates that the fast cooling process was not successfully performed, in other words, the process established enough time to form the first crystalline phase previously the occurrence of the vitrification. Figures 2b and 2c respectively shown the X-ray diffraction spectra of materials produced using only steelmaking slag and both residues. Absence of notable crystalline peaks indicates that the materials are amorphous27. Therefore, the fast cooling processes were successfully performed Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) analyses of materials Images obtained by SEM analysis of the formed materials are shown in Figure 3. The image of a current marketed rock wool is shown in Figure 3d. The homogeneous Materials Research appearance of such image serves as reference to compare with the produced materials. The image of rock wools produced using only granite waste is shown in Figure 3a, in which the formation of a secondary phase was presented. Thus, EDS analysis was used to identify this region, the obtained spectrum is shown on Figure 4. The result is characteristic of the spinel phase, such fact is consistent with the spinel peaks shown in the XRD image of this material (Figure 2a). The homogeneous appearances shown in Figures 3b and 3c indicate that secondary phases were not formed on materials produced using only steelmaking slag or both residues. Such results are in accordance with the amorphous curves in the XRD spectra obtained for these materials (Figures 2b and 2c) Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA) Figure 5 shows the results of DTA testing, where the graphics express the thermal behavior of the produced materials. Exothermic peaks correspond to the crystallization temperatures of the materials, while endothermic peaks represent the melting temperatures. Differential thermal analysis of material produced using only granite waste is shown in Figure 5a. Results indicate a crystallization temperature of 780 C and a Figure 3. SEM images of rock wools fabricated using only granite waste (a), only steelmaking slag (b), both residues (c), and from a industrial sample (d). 2015; 18(1) Recovery of Steelmaking Slag and Granite Waste in the Production of Rock Wool 209 Figure 4. EDS of secondary phase found in the material produced using only granite waste. Figure 5. Differential thermal analysis of rock wools fabricated using only granite waste (a), only steelmaking slag (b), both residues (c), and from a industrial sample (d). melting temperature of approximately 1200 C. Figure 5b shows that the material produced using only steelmaking slag presented a crystallization temperature of 840 C and melting temperature of 1150 C. The association of both residues generated a material with crystallization temperature of 850 C and melting temperature of 1220 C, as presented in Figure 5c. Images obtained by SEM analysis of the formed materials are shown in Figure 3. Results of all produced materials are in an accordance with the DTA obtained from a current marketed rock wool (Figure 5d), since the crystallization temperature of 830 C and melting temperature of 1160 C are close to the range obtained. 210 Alves et al. Materials Research Table 3. Herty Viscosity Tests: results of the distance traveled by each batch prior to solidify. Casting temperature Granite waste Steel. slag Both residues 1400 C 40 mm 120 mm 110 mm 1450 C 50 mm 150 mm 130 mm 1500 C 70 mm 180 mm 160 mm Rock wool is employed for the manufacture of products designed to prevent fire spread. According to the Thermal Insulation Manufacturers Association, the temperatures reached in a typical building fire are approximately 925 C and 1030 C after 1 and 2 hours, respectively 16. The rock wools present devitrification temperatures of about C, then forming a polycrystalline material that is thermally and essentially dimensionally stable, which is high enough to contain a structural fire for several hours. The produced materials devitrified at tempe
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks