Growth Accounting and GDP | Gross Domestic Product | Economic Growth

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 2
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Information Report
Category:

Documents

Published:

Views: 9 | Pages: 2

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

Share
Related documents
Description
Growth Accounting and GDP
Transcript
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growth_accounting Growth accounting  Gross domestic product (GDP) is a monetary measure of the market value of all final goods and services produced in a period (quarterly or yearly). Nominal GDP estimates are commonly used to determine the economic performance of a whole country or region, and to make international comparisons. Nominal GDP per capita does not, however, reflect differences in the cost of living and the inflation rates of the countries; therefore using a GDP PPP per capita basis is arguably more useful when comparing differences in living standards between nations. Growth accounting  is a procedure used in economics to measure the contribution of different factors to economic growth and to indirectly compute the rate of technological progress, measured as a residual, in an economy. This methodology was introduced by Robert Solow in 1957. [1]  Growth accounting decomposes the growth rate of economy's total output into that which is due to increases in the amount of factors used — usually the increase in the amount of  capital and labor  — and that which cannot be accounted for by observable changes in factor utilization. The unexplained part of growth in GDP is then taken to represent increases in productivity (getting more output with the same amounts of inputs) or a measure of broadly defined technological progress. The technique has been applied to virtually every economy in the world and a common finding is that observed levels of economic growth cannot be explained simply by changes in the stock of capital in the economy or population and labor force growth rates. Hence, technological progress plays a key role in the economic growth of nations, or the lack of it. [2]   Example [edit]     Decomposing increase in output into that due to technology and that due to increase in capital (click to enlarge)  As an abstract example consider an economy whose total output (GDP) grows at 3% per year. Over the same period its capital stock grows at 6% per year and its labor force by 1%. The contribution of the growth rate of capital to output is equal to that growth rate weighted by the share of capital in total output and the contribution of labor is given by the growth rate of labor weighted by labor's share in income. If capital's share in output is  1   ⁄   3 , then labor's share is  2   ⁄   3  (assuming these are the only two factors of production). This means that the portion of growth in output which is due to changes in factors is .06×(  1   ⁄   3 )+.01×(  2   ⁄   3 )=.027 or 2.7%. This means that there is still 0.3% of the  growth in output that cannot be accounted for. This remainder is the increase in the productivity of factors that happened over the period, or the measure of technological progress during this time. Technical derivation [edit]   The total output of an economy is modeled as being produced by various factors of production, with capital and labor being the primary ones in modern economies (although land and natural resources can also be included). This is usually captured by an aggregate production function: where Y is total output, K is the stock of capital in the economy, L is the labor force (or population) and A is a catch all factor for technology, role of institutions and other relevant forces which measures how productively capital and labor are used in production. Standard assumptions on the form of the function F(.) is that it is increasing in K, L, A (if you increase productivity or you increase the amount of factors used you get more output) and that it is homogeneous of degree one, or in other words that there are constant returns to scale (which means that if you double both K and L you get double the output). The assumption of constant returns to scale facilitates the assumption of  perfect competition which in turn implies that factors get
Recommended
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks