Assessment of policy instruments for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from buildings

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 16
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Information Report
Category:

Genealogy

Published:

Views: 3 | Pages: 16

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

Share
Related documents
Description
Assessment of policy instruments for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from buildings U n i t e d N a t i o n s E n v i r o n m e n t P r o g r a m m e Summary and Recommendations Copyright United Nations
Transcript
Assessment of policy instruments for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from buildings U n i t e d N a t i o n s E n v i r o n m e n t P r o g r a m m e Summary and Recommendations Copyright United Nations Environment Programme and CEU, 2007 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Disclaimer The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement. UNEP promotes environmentally sound practices globally and in its own activities. This publication is printed on 100% recycled paper. Our distribution policy aims to reduce UNEP s carbon footprint. Printed on paper from sustainably managed forests SUMMARY Residential and commercial buildings account for approximately one third of all energy related GHG emissions worldwide, which is expected to further increase in the future. Numerous barriers such as market failures, hidden costs and benefits, first-cost barriers, behavioural, informative and structural barriers hinder the realization of the often calculated significant saving potential. These barriers are often overcome by public policies and programmes. Such policies can be divided into the categories of regulatory, economic and fiscal incentives as well as informative/support instruments. However, as there is a large number of policy instruments, the question often emerges: how to choose the right one? Which are the most effective ones? In order to answer these questions, a comprehensive assessment of these tools is necessary. The purpose of this report was to provide an appraisal of the instruments available for improving energy efficiency in buildings in order to assist policy-makers in the decision process. Therefore, twenty of the most important instruments were chosen (see table 1) and comparatively evaluated in this study based on concrete case studies. Over 80 evaluation case studies of implemented policy instruments and review articles were identified and Table 1: Policy instruments analysed in this study Control and regulatory Economic and instruments market-based instruments Normative: Appliance standards Building codes Procurement regulations Energy efficiency obligations and quotas Informative: Mandatory audits Utility Demand-side management (DSM) programs Mandatory labelling and certifica-tion programs greenhouse gas emissions from buildings Energy performance contracting Cooperative procurement Energy efficiency certificate schemes Kyoto Protocol flexible mechanisms Fiscal instruments and incentives Taxes Tax exemptions / reductions Public benefit charges Capital subsidies, grants, subsidized loans Support, information and voluntary action Voluntary certification and labelling Voluntary and negotiated agreements Public leadeship programs Awareness raising, education, information campaigns Detailed billing and disclosure programs served as the basis for the analysis. They cover 52 countries from all inhabited continents. Effectiveness of the instruments in reducing GHG emissions, cost-effectiveness for society and success factors were chosen as assessment criteria. As can be seen on table 2 (next page), many policy instruments evaluated in this study can achieve high savings at low or even negative costs for society. Economic instruments such as energy performance contracting and white if all EU-member states are counted separately if the benefits of saved energy and the associated avoided expenses are taken into account in the cost-effectiveness calculations certificates achieve diverging results as some of them are still rather new for the buildings sector, but have a high potential. Under the category of fiscal instruments, subsidies, grants and tax exemptions can lead to high saving, but subsidies are less costeffective to society. Financial incentives can be helpful to kick-start the market for new energy efficient products as well as for developing countries where funding is not always available. The effectiveness of voluntary instruments such as voluntary labelling and agreements depends on the context as well as on accompanying policy measures. Information instruments such as Assessment of policy instruments for reducing awareness raising programs are moderately effective depending on the design, but can successfully reinforce other instruments. Regulatory and control instruments such as building codes were revealed as the most effective and cost-effective category of instruments in this study if enforcement can be secured. A number of regulatory instruments achieved savings in the triple negative digit range of costs. The highest GHG emission reductions in the sample were achieved by appliance standards, building codes, demand-side management (DSM) programs, tax exemptions and labelling. Among the most cost-effective instruments were appliance standards, energy efficiency obligations, DSM programs, public benefit charges and labelling. Most of these are regulatory and control instruments. Appliance standards are projected to be especially costeffective with net societal benefits of -65$/tCO in 0 0 in the United States and -194$/tCO in 0 0 in the EU. These results can be explained by the special characteristics of the buildings sector which is very fragmented and characterized by many barriers to energy efficiency. Regulatory instruments proved to be the most effective as they can overcome some of the most important barriers, for greenhouse gas emissions from buildings U n i t e d n a t i o n s e n v i r o n m e n t P r o g r a m m e Assessment of Policy instruments for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from Buildings example reduce the transaction costs since they eliminate the need to search for information or perform complicated calculations. However, these results - especially the conclusions for costeffectiveness - require further research as the amount of quantitative data was still limited in 2007, especially for developing countries, and partly difficult to compare due to missing information on baselines and methodologies of calculation. Evaluations are especially rare for developing countries. In addition, many policy measures are implemented as part of policy packages which makes assessment of single policy measures difficult. Table 2: Instruments analysed in this report Emission Costeffectiveness Policy Reduction instrument Effectiveness (a) Appliance standards Building codes Medium Public leadership programs, incl. procurement regulations Energy efficiency obligations and quotas Mandatory audit requirement Demand-side management programs (DSM) Energy performance contrac-ting (EPC)/ESCO support (b) Cooperative procurement Energy efficiency certificate schemes/white certificates Medium/, but variable Medium /Medium Medium Medium Medium/ /Medium Special conditions for success, major strengths and limitations, co-benefits Factors for success: periodical update of standards, independent control, information, communication, education No incentive to improve beyond target. Only effective if enforced Can be effectively used to demonstrate new technologies and practices. Mandatory programs have higher potential than voluntary ones. Factors for success: ambitious energy efficiency labeling and testing. Continuous improvements necessary: new energy efficiency measures, short term incentives to transform markets Most effective if combined with other measures such as financial incentives Tend to be more cost-effective for the commercial sector than for residences. Strength: no need for public spending or market intervention, co-benefit of improved competitiveness. Combination with standards and labeling, choice of products with technical and market potential No long-term experience. Transaction costs can be high. Institutional structures needed. Profound interactions with existing policies. Benefits for employment. 4 Assessment of policy instruments for reducing Kyoto Protocol flexible mechanisms (c) Taxation (on CO2 or fuels) Tax exemptions/ reductions Public benefit charges Capital subsidies, grants, subsidized loans Labelling and certification programs Voluntary and negotiated agreements Education and information programs Detailed billing and disclosure programs Low Low Medium Medium/ Medium / Low / Medium Medium Low Low Low Medium Medium/ Medium So far limited number of CDM &JI projects in buildings Effect depends on price elasticity. Revenues can be earmarked for further efficiency. More effective when combined with other tools. If properly structured, stimulate introduction of highly efficient equipment and new buildings. Success factors: independent administration of funds, regular monitoring &feedback, simple &clear design. Positive for low-income households, risk of freeriders, may induce pioneering investments. Mandatory programs more effective than voluntary ones. Effectiveness can be boosted by combination with other instrument and regular updates. Can be effective when regulations are difficult to enforce, combined with financial incentives, and threat of regulation More applicable in residential sector than commercial. Success condition: best applied in combination with other measures. Success conditions: combination with other measures and periodic evaluation. (a) Cost-effectiveness is related to specific societal cost per carbon emissions avoided. (b) Energy service companies (c) Joint Implementation, Clean Development Mechanism, International Emissions Trading (includes the Green Investment Scheme) greenhouse gas emissions from buildings 5 Summary of Findings and Recommendations This study has shown that regulatory instruments and control instruments, such as building codes and appliance standards, were both most effective and normally also most cost-effective in our sample of 80 case studies. However, the key precondition for their success is the sufficient resources and efforts invested for implementation and enforcement, as well as a Table 3: Barriers to energy efficiency and policies as possible remedies Barrier category Instrument category recommended Recommended policy instruments as remedies Economic barriers Regulatory- normative/ regulatory-informative Economic instruments Fiscal instruments Appliance standards, building codes, energy efficiency obligations, mandatory labelling, procurement regulations, DSM programs EPC/ESCOs, cooperative procurement, energy efficiency certificates Taxation, public benefit charges, tax exemptions, subsidies/rebates/grants Hidden costs/ benefits Market failures Cultural/ behavioral barriers Information barriers Structural/ politcal Regulatory-normative Economic instruments Support action Regulatory-normative/ regulatory/informative Economic instruments Fiscal instruments Support, information, voluntary action Support, information, voluntary action Support, information, voluntary action Regulatory/informative Appliance standards, building codes EPC/ ESCOs Public leadership programs Appliance standards, building codes, energy efficiency obligations, mandatory labelling, procurement regulations, DSM programs EPC/ESCOs, cooperative procurement, energy efficiency certificates, Kyoto Flexibility mechanisms Taxation, public benefit charges, tax exemptions, subsidies/rebates/grants Voluntary labelling, voluntary agreement, public leadership programs, awareness raising, detailed billing Voluntary labelling, voluntary agreement, public leadership programs, awareness raising, detailed billing Voluntary labelling, voluntary agreement, public leadership programs, awareness raising, detailed billing mandatory labelling, procurement regulations, DSM programs, mandatory audits Public leadership programs 6 Assessment of policy instruments for reducing regular updating of the specifications. Mandatory and possibly subsidized audits are recommended methods for already existing buildings. By using energy efficient technologies and procurement rules, the public sector can not only reduce its own energy costs but also act as a role model, create a demand for energy efficient products in the country, and give incentives to the private sector. Furthermore, if energy prices reflect real costs a much broader set of efficiency investments become profitable than with subsidized prices; therefore a phase-out or partial lifting of subsidies is often an important precondition to the success of other energy efficiency policies. In return, the introduction of new energy efficient, but more expensive technologies can be supported through grants or rebates if the first-cost barrier is very important such as in developing countries. and construction styles are more likely to be successful. In the past, many buildings, for example in Africa and in Scandinavia, were traditionally constructed in an energy efficient way, but this ancient know-how is increasingly lost or neglected when modern architecture is used or as a result of the uniform solutions offered by the globalised construction industry. It is therefore important that the traditional construction knowhow is conserved and its applicable elements are integrated into the training of architects and other construction professionals. Since different countries face different barriers to energy efficiency, adapting the policy instruments to these barriers (see table 3) increases the effectiveness of the overall policy.however, it is also Limitation in time is a main success factor for fiscal measures such as grants and rebates as well as combination with informative measures in order to prevent or at least limit an increase in consumption following the improved efficiency. National or international financial support and capacity-building are especially important for developing countries. Country-specific solutions which analyse in detail the local market structure, culture, climate, traditions greenhouse gas emissions from buildings 7 important to recognize that the same instruments can significantly vary in their success in different settings which is due to differences in design and other success factors. Success factors vary from instrument to instrument, but correct enforcement and appropriate combination with other instruments as well as involvement of stakeholders and simple procedures and mechanisms are important for all of them. Regular evaluation and monitoring from the beginning help to recognize and correct possible mistakes in the program design and implementation. Long-term commitment of stakeholders and funding agencies, also during the implementation phase, is a success condition, for example for building codes and other regulatory measures which also require regular updates. Adaptation to the local situation and the local barriers is crucial as well. One of the most important success factors for most policy instruments is a transformation of the product or building market which implies a long-lasting and sustainable shift to more energy efficient products or buildings. Since all instruments have advantages and disadvantages, appropriate combination with other policy instruments can maximize the overall effectiveness. The following policy 8 Assessment of policy instruments for reducing Table 4: Recommendations for designing an effective energy efficiency program Program Design and/or Development Program Adoption and/or Implementation Program Monitoring and Evaluation 1. Obtain commitment from legislature, utility commission, or other body 2. Evaluate existing building energy code and other laws and options for implementation and enforcement 3. Involve key stakeholders and assess their support early 4. Use sound economic and environmental quantitative analysis determine costeffective achievable potential for energy efficiency 5. Start with low-cost well established programs, lighting for instance 6. Set annual and cumulative targets using analysis and stakeholder input, e.g. % of base-year energy sales 7. Establish a long-term frame to over-come market and funding cycles 8. Ensure that workable funding me-thods are available to meet EEPS target 9. Take care to select the most appropriate entities responsible for program implementation and/or meeting the target and the procurement rules they must follow 10.Assess training needs and other forms of technical support for code officials, builder associations, building supply organizations, auditors. 11.Contact material and equipment suppliers to ascertain availability of code compliant products 1. Use clear basis for assessing compliance. 2. Update goals regularly 3. Ensure additionality over and above existing program commitments 4. Coordinate with PBF programs 5. Ensure that supply-side resource filings reflect the energy savings goals 6. Approve long-term funding cycles (5-10 years) 7. Design programs to meet custo-mers needs in the relevant market 8. Keep program design simple 9. Educate and train key participants regularly such as builders, building officials, supply companies 10.Provide right resources, code requirements overview, laminated cards, simple software packages, how to conduct plan and site inspections, who to contact for more information. 11.Implementing and enforcing codes requires high level of engineering expertise that many code officials do not have. Contact universities, and architect engineering firms for detailed analysis of codes. 12.Provide budget and staff for the program, and train staff 1. Use methods proven over time 2. Include key tracking and reporting practices in program design 3. Provide qualitative evaluation in addition to a quantita-tive one 4. Evaluate programs regularly against stated objectives 5. Utilize a third party verifier 6. Provide for adequate funding for evaluation 7. Provide feedback to oversight agen-cies and adjust future savings goals as needed 8. Provide for con-sistent and transparent evaluations 9. Maintain a func-tional database that records customer participation over time on geographical location and customer class Source: Sathaye et al Note: EEPS- Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standards, PBF- Public Benefit Fund greenhouse gas emissions from buildings 9 instruments, for example, can be effectively combined: - standards, labelling and financial incentives - regulatory instruments and information programs - public leadership programs and energy performance contracting (EPC), i.e. EPC in the public sector - financial incentives and labelling. Policy packages are particularly beneficial for the success of policy measures in developing countries due to the special barriers there, such as lack of funding, lack of awareness, lack of experts as well as technology (depending on the country) and problems with enforcement of laws. An integrated policy framework combining regulatory instruments, such as standards or mandatory audits in certain buildings, capacity building, training and information campaigns as well as demonstration projects coupled with (fiscal or other) incentives is most likely to effectively reduce GHG emissions in developing countries. Regulatory measures are important, but only effective if special efforts are made to implement and enforce them. While in develope
Recommended
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x