Angel Part | Flood

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 6
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Information Report



Views: 5 | Pages: 6

Extension: DOCX | Download: 0

Related documents
  2.4.1 Defning the design ood  The Design Flood or a hydraulic structure may also be defned in a number o ways, like! The ma imum ood that any structure can saely #ass.! The ood considered or the design o a structure corres#onding to ama imum tolerable risk.! The ood which a #ro$ect %in&ol&ing a hydraulic structure' can sustainwithout any substantial damage, either to the ob$ects which it #rotects orto its own structures.! The largest ood that may be selected or design as saety e&aluation o astructure.Design Flood is also known as the (now Design Flood %(DF'. (t is the oodado#ted or design #ur#ose, and could be! The entire ood hydrogra#h, that is, the #ossible &alues o discharge as aunction o time.! The #eak discharge o the ood hydrogra#h.. 2.4.2 )hoice o design ood  The *ureau o (ndian standard guidelines (+ 4-- %art (/' recommends that the(now Design Flood %(DF' o a structure, de#ending on its im#ortance or riskin&ol&ed, may be chosen rom either one o the ollowing! Probable Maximum Flood (PMF):  This is the ood resulting rom the most se&ere combination o criticalmeteorological and hydrological conditions that rare reasonably #ossiblein the region. The 0F is com#uted by using the robable 0a imum+torm %0+' which is an estimate o the #hysical u##er limit to stormrainall o&er the catchment. This is obtained rom the studies o all thestorms that ha&e occurred o&er the region and ma imiing them or themost critical atmos#heric conditions.! Standard Project Flood (SPF):  This is the ood resulting rom the most se&er combination o meteorological and hydrological conditions considered reasonablycharacteristic o the region. The +F is com#uted rom the +tandardro$ect +torm %++' o&er the watershed considered and may be taken asthe largest storm obser&ed in the region o the watershed. (t is notma imied or the most critical atmos#heric conditions but it may betrans#osed rom an ad$acent region to the watershed under consideration. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur  ! Flood of a specific return period:  This ood is estimated by reuency analysis o the annual ood &alues o adeuate length. +ometimes when the ood data is inadeuate,reuency analysis recorded storm data is made and the storm o a#articular reuency a##lied to the unit hydrogra#h to deri&e the design  ood. This ood usually has a return #eriod greater than the storm. The (DF3s or dierent ty#es o structures constructed across ri&ers are dierent.+ome o the structures which are o im#ortance to water resources engineeringare! +torage Dams.! *arrages and 5eirs! Di&ersion 5orks and )oer dams! )ross drainage works6 brie descri#tion o the structures and their corres#onding (DF3s are discussed+ubseuently 2.4.7 Design ood or storage dams Dams are im#ortant hydraulic structures which are constructed to ser&e a &arietyo #ur#ose, more o which shall be discussed in detail in lesson 7.2. 0ost damsha&e a ca#acity to store substantial amount o water in the reser&oir, and a#ortion o the inow ood gets stored and the e cess o&erows through thes#illways. 6ccording to *ureau o (ndian +tandard guidelines (+ 11227819:,;<uidelines or f ing s#illway ca#acity=, the (DF to be considered or dierentreuirements !F for t e safet# of t e dam (t is the ood or which, when used with standard s#ecifcations, the #erormanceo the dam should be sae against o&erto##ing, structural ailures, and thes#illway and its energy dissi#ation arrangement, i #ro&ided or a lower ood,should unction reasonable well.! For large dams %defned as those with gross storage greater than >? millionm 7 or hydraulic head greater than 7? m', (DF should be based on 0F.! For intermediate dams %gross storage between 1? and >? million m 7 orhydraulic head between 12 m and 7? m', (DF should be based on +F.! For small dams %gross storage between ?. to 1? million m 7 or hydraulic headbetween -. m to 12 m', (DF may be taken as 1?? years return #eriod ood. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur  Floods o larger or smaller magnitude may be used i the haard in&ol&ed in thee&entuality o a ailure is #articularly high or low. The rele&ant #arameters to beconsidered in $udging the haard in addition to the sie would be! Distance to and location o the human habitations on the downstream aterconsidering the likely uture de&elo#ments@ and  ! 0a imum hydraulic ca#acity o the downstream channel at a le&el whichcatastro#hic damage is not e #ected. !F for efficient operation of ener$# dissipation s#stem (t is a ood which may be lower than the (DF or the saety o the dam. 5henthis ood is used with standard s#ecifcations or other actors aecting the#erormance, the energy dissi#ation arrangements are e #ected to work mosteAciently. !Ffor c ec%in$ extent of upstream submer$ence  This de#ends u#on local conditions, ty#e o #ro#erty and eects o thesubmergence or &ery im#ortant structures u#stream like #ower house, mines,etc. Be&els corres#onding to +F or 0F may be used to determinesubmergence eects. For other structures consideration o smaller design oodsand corres#onding le&els attained may suAce. (n general, a 2 C year ood orland acuisition and ? C year ood or built u# #ro#erty acuisition may beado#ted. !F for c ec%in$ extent of do&nstream dama$e in t e 'alle#  This de#ends on local conditions, the ty#e o #ro#erty and eects o itssubmergence. For &ery im#ortant acilities like #owerhouse, outowscorres#onding to the inow design ood or saety o the dam, with all s#illwaygates o#erati&e or o that order may be rele&ant. ormally damage due to#hysical ooding may not be allowed under this condition, but disru#tion o o#eration may be allowed. 2.4.4 Design ood or barrages and weirs 5eirs and barrages, which are di&ersion structures, ha&e usually small storageca#acities, and the risk o loss o lie and #ro#erty would rarely be enhanced byailure o the structure. 6#art rom damageEloss o structure the ailure wouldcause disru#tion o irrigation and communications that are de#endent on thebarrage. 6ccording to the bureau o (ndian +tandard guidelines (+ >9>>%art8(' 819:9, ;ydraulic design o barrages and weirs8guidelines or allu&ial reaches=,the ollowing are recommended! +F or ?? year return #eriod ood or designing free board  ! ? year return #eriod ood or designing o items other than ree board. 2.4. Design ood or di&ersion works and coer dam 5hene&er a hydraulic structure like a dam or a barrage is constructed acrossa  ri&er, a tem#orary structure called a coer dam is built frst or obstructing theri&er ow and the water di&erted though a di&ersion channel or tunnel. The*ureau o (ndian +tandards in its guideline (+ 1??:4 %art (' 819:2, ;)riteria ordesign o di&ersion works 8 art ( )oer Dams= recommends the ollowing;The coer dam being a tem#orary structure is normally designed or aood with reuency less than that or the design o the main structure. The choice o a #articular reuency shall be made on #ractical $udgmentkee#ing in &iew the construction #eriod and the stage o construction o the main structure and its im#ortance. 6ccordingly, the design ood ischosen.For seasonal coerdams %those which are constructed e&ery year andwashed out during the ood season', and the initial construction stages o the main structure, a ood reuency o 2? years or more can be ado#ted.For coer dams to be retained or more than one season and or thead&anced construction stage o the main structure, a ood o 1?? yearsreuency may be ado#ted=. 2.4.> Flood or cross drainage works )ross drainage works are normally encountered in irrigation canal networksystem. <enerally canals ow under gra&ity and oten are reuired to cross localstreams and ri&ers. This is done by either con&eying the canal water o&er thestream by o&erhead aueducts or by #assing below the stream though si#honaueducts. These structures are called cross drainage works and according tothe *ureau o (ndian +tandard guidelines (+--:4 %art (' C 1997, ;)ode o #ractice or design o cross C drainage works= the ollowing is recommended.;Design ood or drainage channel to be ado#ted or cross drainage worksshould de#end u#on the sie o the canal, sie o the drainage channel andlocation o the cross drainage. 6 &ery long canal, crossing drainage channels inthe initial reach, damage to which is likely to aect the canal su##lies o&er alarge area and or a long #eriod, should be gi&en #ro#er im#ortance.)ross drainage structures are di&ided into our categories de#ending u#on thecanal discharge and drainage discharge. Design ood to be ado#ted or theseour categories o cross drainage structures is gi&en as in the ollowing table
Flood 2011 part 1

Flood 2011 part 1

113 pages

View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks