An Out-of-Plane Grating Coupler for Efficient Butt-Coupling Between Compact Planar Waveguides and Single-Mode Fibers - PDF

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 7
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Information Report
Category:

Economy & Finance

Published:

Views: 0 | Pages: 7

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

Share
Related documents
Description
IEEE JOURNAL OF QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, VOL. 38, NO. 7, JULY An Out-of-Plane Grating Coupler for Efficient Butt-Coupling Between Compact Planar Waveguides and Single-Mode Fibers Dirk Taillaert, Member,
Transcript
IEEE JOURNAL OF QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, VOL. 38, NO. 7, JULY An Out-of-Plane Grating Coupler for Efficient Butt-Coupling Between Compact Planar Waveguides and Single-Mode Fibers Dirk Taillaert, Member, IEEE, Wim Bogaerts, Member, IEEE, Peter Bienstman, Member, IEEE, Thomas F. Krauss, Peter Van Daele, Ingrid Moerman, Member, IEEE, Steven Verstuyft, Kurt De Mesel, and Roel Baets, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract We have designed and fabricated an out-of-plane coupler for butt-coupling from fiber to compact planar waveguides. The coupler is based on a short second-order grating or photonic crystal, etched in a waveguide with a low-index oxide cladding. The coupler is optimized using mode expansion-based simulations. Simulations using a 2-D model show that up to 74% coupling efficiency between single-mode fiber and a 240-nm-thick GaAs AlO waveguide is possible. We have measured 19% coupling efficiency on test structures. Index Terms Integrated optics, optical planar waveguide components, waveguide coupler. I. INTRODUCTION FUTURE large-scale photonic integrated circuits will probably use photonic crystal waveguides or other compact planar waveguides. One of the major problems to be solved is the interface between the compact waveguide and the outside world. Coupling to a standard single-mode fiber using edge-coupling is a daunting task, because of the small dimensions of the waveguides (photonic crystal waveguides [1] [3] are typically an order of magnitude smaller than conventional integrated optical waveguides). In particular, in high-vertical-index-contrast structures, such as silicon-on-insulator (SOI) or GaAs AlO, the light is strongly confined in a few hundred nm thin layer and coupling light into these waveguides is a problem. We propose the use of a grating coupler to butt-couple light from a single-mode fiber, perpendicular to the surface, into planar waveguides. This coupling scheme allows dense integration and wafer-scale testing because there is no need to cleave the devices. A sketch of the device is shown in Fig. 1. For this coupling scheme to work, two problems have to be solved. The light has to make a 90-degree turn Manuscript received September 13, 2001; revised March 28, This work was supported in part by the European Union in the context of the IST project PICCO. The work of W. Bogaerts was supported in part by the Flemish Institute for the Industrial Advancement of Scientific and Technological Research (IWT) under a specialization grant. The work of P. Bienstman was supported by the Flemish National Fund for Scientific Research (FWO-Vlaanderen) under a doctoral fellowship. D. Taillaert, W. Bogaerts, P. Bienstman, P. Van Daele, I. Moerman, S. Verstuyft, K. De Mesel, and R. Baets are with the Department of Information Technology (INTEC), Ghent University-IMEC, 9000 Gent, Belgium ( T. F. Krauss is with the School of Physics and Astronomy, St. Andrews University, St. Andrews KY16 9SS, U.K. Publisher Item Identifier S (02)05710-X. Fig. 1. Out-of-plane fiber coupler principle. The dimensions are not to scale for clarity. Only the core of the fiber is shown. from the fiber to the waveguide and a broad (approximately 10 m) waveguide has to be tapered into a narrow photonic crystal waveguide, preferably over a short distance. In the latter section, only a lateral spot-size convertor is needed, which is easier to achieve than a vertical spot-size convertor. In this paper we focus on the 90-degree bending problem. Several grating couplers have been demonstrated that couple light out of [4] [5] or into [6] waveguides. These couplers achieve high efficiencies ( 50%) but have a narrow bandwidth and they use relatively long ( 100 m), weak gratings. In our design, the grating is much shorter (10 m long) to be able to butt-couple to fiber. Therefore, the grating has to provide strong coupling and a relatively large overlap between the grating and the waveguide mode is needed. In a high-vertical-index-contrast structure, it is possible to achieve this with a shallow grating because of the strong vertical confinement. II. COMPUTATIONAL METHOD AND STRUCTURE MODEL A rigorous electromagnetic method is needed to design the coupler. Traditional grating theory which treats the grating as a small perturbation or of infinite extent is not accurate because our grating has only approximately 20 periods. A popular method to simulate photonic crystal structures of finite extent is the finite difference time-domain (FDTD) method [7]. Because we are using a waveguide structure and FDTD is rather slow, we prefer the eigenmode expansion technique /02$ IEEE 950 IEEE JOURNAL OF QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, VOL. 38, NO. 7, JULY 2002 Fig. 2. Computational model used in simulations. [8]. The boundary conditions are of utmost importance in our calculations because a lot of light is coupled out of a waveguide and heading straight for the boundaries of the computational domain. Perfectly matched layers (PMLs) [9] perform well and have also been introduced in mode expansion recently [10]. We used the CAMFR-simulation tool [11], which is based on eigenmode expansion and propagation with PML boundary conditions. In this work we consider only 1-D gratings in 2-D simulations and TE-polarization (E-field parallel to the grating grooves). This polarization also has a large bandgap for triangular lattices of air holes in a high index material [12] and is, therefore, interesting for photonic crystal based integrated circuits. It is expected that in a real 3-D configuration, the coupling efficiency will be lower than obtained with 2-D model-based simulations. We calculate the coupling from waveguide to fiber, because this is easier with mode expansion. The coupling efficiency from fiber to waveguide is the same as from waveguide to fiber because we consider the coupling from one mode of a waveguide to one mode of another waveguide and the materials used are reciprocal. This powerful reciprocity principle is well known [13] and a mathematical proof based on Maxwell s equations is given in [14] for example. To avoid any doubt, we have also calculated the coupling from fiber to waveguide with 2-D FDTD simulations for the final designs and verified that it is the same as the calculated coupling from waveguide to fiber. Our waveguide consists of a 240-nm-thick GaAs core with an oxide cladding on top of a GaAs substrate, as shown in Fig. 2. The thickness of the oxide will be optimized. A grating is etched into the GaAs layer. The top and bottom boundaries have PML to avoid parasitic reflections. The waveguide mode is incident from the left and is normalized so the input power equals 1. In a first step, reflection and transmission of the entire structure are calculated. Afterwards, the field is calculated from which the power flux and overlap with a fiber mode can be calculated. The coupling efficiency to fiber is the fraction of the power in the waveguide mode that couples to the fiber. is the reflection at the waveguide grating interface, and is the transmission through the grating to the right. Fig. 3. Reflection (solid line) and out-of-plane coupling (dashed line) versus grating period for different etch depths. Out-of-plane coupling is defined as 1 R T and consists of coupling to air/substrate and scattering at the interface. Grating duty cycle = 50%. III. SIMULATION RESULTS The coupler is based on a so-called second-order grating where the first-order diffraction couples light out of the waveguide, producing a surface-normal propagating field. An in-depth treatment of second-order gratings can be found in [15]. Because we use this grating as a coupler (first-order diffraction), we will use the term coupler grating instead of second-order grating in the rest of this paper. In this section, we describe the design and properties of the coupler grating and optimizations of the structure for optimal coupling efficiency. We start with a simple grating in part A and introduce enhancements in part B. All structures are designed for the 1550-nm wavelength. A. Simple Coupler Grating We can achieve 90-degree coupling with a grating when the grating period equals the wavelength divided by the effective refractive index. As the grating changes the effective index, the precise grating period has to be calculated numerically. Fig. 3 shows the reflection (solid lines) and out-of-plane coupling (dashed lines) as a function of for different etch TAILLAERT et al.: OUT-OF-PLANE GRATING COUPLER FOR EFFICIENT BUTT-COUPLING 951 Fig. 4. Reflection versus grating period for different duty cycles. A 50% duty cycle (triangles) has minimum reflection at resonance. Etch depth = 65 nm. Fig. 6. Coupling efficiency and bandwidth (580-nm period, 50% duty cycle) for different etch depths. Optimal etch depth = 65 nm (thick line). Fig. 5. Reflection (squares), transmission (triangles), top emitted power (crosses), and overall coupling efficiency to fiber (thick solid line) for 580-nm period, 65-nm etch depth grating of 20 periods. Fig. 7. Coupling efficiency versus oxide cladding thickness. depths. Out-of-plane coupling is defined as and consists of the light that is coupled upwards and downwards and scattered at the interface. The reflection curves show a peak which corresponds to the resonance condition and 90-degree coupling. As the etch depth increases, increases and the resonant period shifts to larger periods (because decreases). The out-of-plane coupling curves have a minimum at resonance. This minimum out-of-plane coupling has a maximum value for 65-nm etch depth. Previous results used a rectangular grating with 50% duty cycle (equal tooth and groove widths). Reflection for different duty cycles is shown in Fig. 4. The duty cycle has a major impact on the amount of reflection. The resonance peak is smallest for the 50% duty cycle. For 65-nm etch depth and 50% duty cycle, the resonant grating period is 580 nm. We will use these values as a starting point for our design. For this grating ( nm, etch depth 65 nm, duty cycle 50%, 20 periods), we have calculated the power that is coupled to the air and into the fiber in Fig. 5. To calculate the coupling efficiency to fiber, we use a Gaussian profile with a full width ( ) of 10.5 m as a model of the fiber mode. Overall coupling efficiency to the fiber is 15% at 1550 nm. Around the resonance wavelength, the outcoupling efficiency is rather low, but the coupling to the fiber is high. Away from the resonance wavelength, the outcoupling efficiency becomes higher but the coupling to the fiber is worse because of the phase mismatch. These two together cause a quite flat and large bandwidth. This wavelength dependence is only an approximation and will depend on the mode field diameter and NA of a particular fiber. Fig. 6 shows the coupling efficiency versus wavelength for the same structure, but for different etch depths (fabrication tolerances). The 3-dB bandwidth is approximately 90 nm for the optimal etch depth (65 nm, thick curve). These results were obtained for a structure with infinite oxide cladding thickness. We will now look at the more realistic structure with a finite oxide thickness and a high-index substrate. The oxide cladding thickness should be at least 0.5 m, to avoid loss due to leakage of the guided mode to the substrate. The oxide thickness has little effect on the total amount of light that is coupled out, but has a serious impact on the air/substrate ratio [16]. A good choice of oxide thickness is important. From the coupling efficiency versus oxide thickness curve (Fig. 7), it can be seen that there is a 3-dB difference between the minima and maxima. The spacing between two maxima is half a wavelength, which confirms that this behavior is caused by interference between the direct upward wave and the reflection at the oxide/substrate interface. The overall efficiency is 20% or 7 db, for a 700-nm-thick or 1200-nm-thick cladding. The efficiency is limited by reflection, transmission, and coupling to the substrate. To improve this value, reflection and transmission of the grating should be reduced and the directionality (air/substrate ratio) improved. B. Combined Coupler and Reflector Grating To reduce and at resonance, we propose a structure consisting of a grating coupler section and a first-order grating reflector [Fig. 8(a)]. It is possible to create a good reflector with a few periods when etching completely through the waveguide 952 IEEE JOURNAL OF QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, VOL. 38, NO. 7, JULY 2002 Fig. 8. (a) Combined coupler and reflector grating. (b) Same structure with a multilayer reflector under the waveguide. Fig. 10. Comparison of efficiency and bandwidth of the simple coupler grating (s1 diamonds), combined coupler and reflector grating (s2 squares), and the same structure with a multilayer bottom reflector (s3 triangles). Fig. 9. Optimal grating parameters. The grating is etched in the GaAs waveguide core. Etch depth e: 38 nm. Period 32: 566 nm. Groove width w2: 283 nm. Number of periods N 2: 20. Spacing d: 200 nm. Period 31: 280 nm. Groove width w1: 140 nm. Number of periods N 1: 70. (1-D photonic crystal). However, it is necessary to design a reflector grating with the same etch depth as the coupler grating because the spacing between the two gratings is critical and therefore they have to be fabricated in one step. We use the following procedure to optimize the lattice parameters. For a given etch depth, the coupler grating period is determined by the resonance condition as in part A. Afterwards, a first-order reflector grating is designed with the same etch depth. Finally, the spacing between the two gratings is optimized. This procedure is repeated for different etch depths and the final result has a maximum coupling efficiency to fiber of 38%. The grating parameters are summarized in Fig. 9. With this structure, almost all light can be coupled out at the resonant wavelength, but the efficiency is still limited by coupling to the substrate. The maximum efficiency is 3 db larger than the simple coupler grating, but the bandwidth is limited to 15 nm, as can be seen in Fig. 10. However, this bandwidth is quite large compared to the bandwidth of other grating couplers using long gratings. To enhance the efficiency of grating couplers (avoid coupling to substrate), a blazed or parallellogram-shaped grating [17] is sometimes used. However, this makes simulation and fabrication much more difficult and the behavior of a blazed grating in our structure is yet unknown. Another solution to avoid coupling into the substrate is the addition of a distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) under the waveguide [Fig. 8(b)]. It is obvious that the spacing between the waveguide and the bottom reflector Fig. 11. Layer structure with a multilayer bottom reflector (dark grey is GaAs and light grey is AlO ). will be important [15], but fabrication tolerances are reasonable because we are using a wavelength of 1550 nm. Because of the large index contrast between GaAs and AlO, only two mirror pairs are needed and therefore we will use the term multilayer reflector instead of DBR. In a first step, we design a multilayer reflector for maximum reflectivity. Afterwards, we optimize the thickness of the layer between the waveguide and multilayer reflector for maximum efficiency. The details of the layer structure can be found in Fig. 11, in which the grating is the same as in the structure without a multilayer reflector (Fig. 9). At the central wavelength, more than 95% of the light can be coupled upwards. Because of the coupling loss to the fiber, the overall efficiency is limited to 74%. The bandwidth is similar to the structure without a multilayer reflector (Fig. 10). The most critical feature is the spacing between the coupler and the reflector grating. An error of a quarter wavelength will reduce the efficiency to almost zero (Fig. 12). Therefore, the fabrication of this structure requires state-of-the-art electron-beam lithography. All our simulation results are for TE-polarization, and the coupling efficiency for TM is low (less than 20 db) for all the structures described in this paper. IV. PRELIMINARY EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS In this section, we describe our first experimental results. Devices were fabricated in GaAs AlGaAs material grown by metal organic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) on a GaAs substrate (240-nm GaAs core/290-nm Al Ga As TAILLAERT et al.: OUT-OF-PLANE GRATING COUPLER FOR EFFICIENT BUTT-COUPLING 953 Fig. 12. Efficiency versus spacing between the coupler and reflector grating. Fig. 13. Measured coupling efficiency versus wavelength. This is the optical power at the detector divided by the input power from the fiber. cladding/115 nm GaAs/240 nm Al Ga As/115 nm GaAs/240 nm Al Ga As). This layer structure has a multilayer reflector under the waveguide, but the thickness of the cladding layer differs from the optimized structure in Fig. 11. Because this difference is approximately half a wavelength, the calculated efficiencies are comparable. The grating consists of a coupler and a reflector section (Fig. 9) and the calculated efficiency is 74%. The gratings were fabricated using electron-beam lithography and reactive ion etching. Afterwards, ridge waveguides were defined using optical lithography and etching. The width of these waveguides is 10 m and the etch depth is 150 nm. A last step was the etching of 20- m-wide and 1500-nm-deep oxidation trenches and wet thermal oxidation of the Al Ga As layers. The oxidized layers are mechanically stable and remain robustly attached to the GaAs layers. For the measurements, we use a widely tunable laser source with 1-mW output power and polarization-maintaining output fiber (PMF). The TE-polarized light is coupled from the PMF via the grating into the waveguide. The output light from the waveguide facet is imaged onto a detector or an infrared (IR) camera. During initial alignment, we use the IR camera to monitor the waveguide spot. The output power versus wavelength for a 10- m-wide ridge waveguide is shown in Fig. 13. A maximum efficiency of 14% (0.14 mw on detector) is measured in the nm wavelength range. The shortest wavelength that is measured is 1510 nm because of the limitation on the tuning range of the laser. The 3-dB bandwidth is larger than 25 nm. The fiber-to-waveguide distance is approximately 10 m. We have measured the coupling efficiency from fiber to waveguide and not from waveguide to fiber because the latter requires coupling light into the waveguide at the edge, which is difficult. The peaks in the measurements are similar to Fabry Perot fringes and are caused by a cavity formed by the grating and a cleaved facet. The spacing between the peaks depends on the cavity length (300 m in this case). To estimate the actual coupling efficiency, we must take into account these cavity effects because the fiber-to-waveguide coupling efficiency is the power that would be measured when there is no reflection at the facet. When neglecting the waveguide propagation losses, the two parameters of the cavity are the facet reflection and the grating reflection. The facet reflection is 0.36 for our waveguide. Fig. 14. Measured lateral alignment sensitivity. The z axis is the waveguide propagation direction and the x axis is parallel to the grating grooves; 1- and 3-dB contour lines are shown. The grating reflection is not known but can be estimated from. Without any reflection at the grating, there is no cavity and 64% of the incoupled power reaches the detector. In our measurement results, is approximately 1.4 and the Fabry Perot peaks correspond to 75% of the power that is coupled into the waveguide. Therefore, we estimate the actual coupling efficiency to be 19% ( 0.14/0.75). An advantage of the out-of-plane coupler compared to edge coupling is the relaxed lateral alignment sensitivity. The measured optical power as a function of the position of the fiber is shown in Fig. 14. A lateral deviation of
Recommended
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x